<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Cynic Gazette &#187; Skepticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cynicgazette.com/tag/skepticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cynicgazette.com</link>
	<description>Web Design, Skepticism, Photography and Social Comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s Psychic Challenge: Keeping the great unwashed believing anything.</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/10/08/americas-psychic-challenge-keeping-the-great-unwashed-believing-anything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/10/08/americas-psychic-challenge-keeping-the-great-unwashed-believing-anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 17:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joisey Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americas Psychic Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicgazette.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To quote one of the greatest fictional characters of all time, Gob (Jobe) from Arrested Development:
&#8220;Oh COME ON!&#8221;
There&#8217;s a *new* reality show on Lifetime which pits American &#8220;psychics&#8221; against each other in a challenge-format entertainment show called America&#8217;s Psychic Challenge. For any other skeptics out there who just thought to themselves &#8220;oh my sweet zombie [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To quote one of the greatest fictional characters of all time, Gob (Jobe) from <a title="Arrested Development on Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrested_Development_(TV_series)" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/en.wikipedia.org');" target="_blank">Arrested Development</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh COME ON!&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a *new* reality show on Lifetime which pits American &#8220;psychics&#8221; against each other in a challenge-format entertainment show called <strong><a title="America's Psychic Challenge | myLifetime.com" href="http://www.mylifetime.com/on-tv/shows/americas-psychic-challenge" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.mylifetime.com');" target="_blank">America&#8217;s Psychic Challenge</a></strong>. For any other skeptics out there who just thought to themselves &#8220;oh my sweet zombie jesus on a crud cracker,&#8221; all I can do is say &#8220;I feel ya, dog.&#8221;</p>
<p>I want to say, &#8220;who cares? It&#8217;s Lifetime. It&#8217;s <em>entertainment</em>.&#8221; I can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>While I find the concept of this show to be ridiculous fodder for the local vomitorium, we&#8217;re going to watch it and find out what alternate title is most suited to this show:</p>
<ul>
<li>America&#8217;s Best Guesser</li>
<li>America&#8217;s Crappiest Testing Criteria Challenge</li>
<li>America&#8217;s Cold Reading Challenge</li>
<li>Make James Randi Cry</li>
<li>America&#8217;s Shameless Fraud Challenge</li>
<li>Will Women Freak Out if Sex And The City Isn&#8217;t On For An Hour</li>
</ul>
<p>We&#8217;re hooking my laptop to the TV to watch episode 1 tonight&#8230; right after the new episode of <a title="Bones on FOX" href="http://www.fox.com/bones/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.fox.com');">Bones</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/10/08/americas-psychic-challenge-keeping-the-great-unwashed-believing-anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think of someone right when they die</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/10/03/think-of-someone-right-when-they-die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/10/03/think-of-someone-right-when-they-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joisey Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicgazette.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess my recent experience of my dad passing away&#8217;s started a little obsession with death, and mixed with my rampant skepticism of the more woo-woo beliefs people have, I want to quote this little probability calculation from Brian Dunning&#8217;s Here Be Dragons:

There are 105,120 5-minute intervals in a year
If you only know 10 people (family, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my recent experience of my dad passing away&#8217;s started a little obsession with death, and mixed with my rampant skepticism of the more woo-woo beliefs people have, I want to quote this little probability calculation from Brian Dunning&#8217;s <a href="http://herebedragonsmovie.com/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/herebedragonsmovie.com');" target="_blank">Here Be Dragons</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li>There are 105,120 5-minute intervals in a year</li>
<li>If you only know 10 people (family, friends, celebs, etc) who die each year&#8230;</li>
<li>And you only think of each of them once a year</li>
<li>There&#8217;s a 1:10,512 chance you&#8217;ll think about one during the 5-minute interval in which they die.</li>
<li>But since there&#8217;s about 300,000,000 people living in the USA right now,</li>
<li>That each year about 28,539 Americans think about someone during the 5-minute interval in which the person they&#8217;re thinking about dies.</li>
</ul>
<p>Not so spooky anymore, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/10/03/think-of-someone-right-when-they-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>But really&#8230; (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/07/25/but-really-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/07/25/but-really-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joisey Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astrology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicgazette.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, so we&#8217;ve established that nobody felt like commenting that they believe in palm reading&#8230; surprisingly nobody emailed me sand said they did but didn&#8217;t want to comment publicly either. I&#8217;m not trying to paint anyone green and put then in charge of an army of flying monkeys, I just want to know.
How about astrology? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so we&#8217;ve established that nobody felt like commenting that they believe in palm reading&#8230; surprisingly nobody emailed me sand said they did but didn&#8217;t want to comment publicly either. I&#8217;m not trying to paint anyone green and put then in charge of an army of flying monkeys, I just want to know.</p>
<p>How about astrology? Do you believe in astrology? </p>
<p>I know at least one of you* has to because you post daily bulletins about it, so the count here is at least one. So lets hear it. </p>
<p>*You&#8217;re counted, you don&#8217;t need to comment if you don&#8217;t feel like it.</p>
<p><em>[This was originally a myspace blog entry, and it refers to the comments there]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/07/25/but-really-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>But really&#8230; (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/07/24/but-really-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/07/24/but-really-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joisey Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicgazette.com/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But really, smart-ass answers aside, do you believe in palm reading?
 
[This is from a myspace.com blog entry, and refers to the comments there]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But really, smart-ass answers aside, do you believe in palm reading?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><em>[This is from a myspace.com blog entry, and refers to the comments there]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/07/24/but-really-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Homeopathic Birth Control</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/05/06/free-homeopathic-birth-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/05/06/free-homeopathic-birth-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 14:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joisey Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarcasm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wholefoods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/05/free-homeopathic-birth-control/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m pleased to offer the newest product from Snyder Heavy Industries, Snyder&#8217;s Homeopathic Birth Control Tonic, and I&#8217;m offering it at zero cost to the consumer. Because here at Snyder Heavy Indurstries, we care, and are hoping to get a Wholefoods distribution deal since they&#8217;re a leading retailer of homeopathic pills.
How does it work? I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pleased to offer the newest product from Snyder Heavy Industries, Snyder&#8217;s Homeopathic Birth Control Tonic, and I&#8217;m offering it at zero cost to the consumer. Because here at Snyder Heavy Indurstries, we care, and are hoping to get a Wholefoods distribution deal since they&#8217;re a leading retailer of homeopathic pills.</p>
<p>How does it work? I thought you might ask. Samuel Hahnemann, the father of homeopathy, bases everything on what he calls the law of similars (basically that like treats like). So, something that causes a problem becomes a solution when introduced in super dilluted quantities, since the medium (water usually, sometimes pure alcohol) remembers the &#8220;vibration&#8221; of the ingredient.</p>
<p>Being that sperm is the leading cause of pregnancy, homeopathic says that a super dillution will cure AND prevent it! That&#8217;s right, if I bolt in a cup and mix it with enough water, it&#8217;ll double as birth control AND a morning-after solution!</p>
<p>Most homeopathic remidies on the shelf at Wholefoods are available in dillutions of 30C, since Hahnemann says this as a good general dillution for most ailments, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m going with. What&#8217;s that mean? Glad you asked.</p>
<p>Homeopathic ingredients, in this case, my freshly squozen sack chowder, all get dilluted on the X scale or the C scale with either distilled water or pure alcohol. A dillution of 1X means one part per 10, and a dillution of 1C means 1 part per 100. So, our dillution ratio of 30C means the dillution will be 1:100^30 or 1:1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.</p>
<p>Every few dillutions, you have to &#8220;actuate&#8221; or shake the mixture. Videos of professional homeopaths show actuating as banging a bottle on a leather book, or just shaking it (not unlike a polaroid picture) the way you&#8217;d shake a ketchup (NOT catsup) bottle. I&#8217;ll be using the &#8220;book&#8221; method to make sure my gentleman&#8217;s leavings are properly actuated.</p>
<p>So come one, come all (I know I will) and get your bottle of Snyder&#8217;s Homeopathic Birth Control tonic!</p>
<p>*ahem*</p>
<p>Sound stupid to you too? Well, that&#8217;s homeopathy in a nutshell. One other thing worth mentioning&#8211;at dillutions over 12C, you&#8217;re guaranteed that you won&#8217;t get a single molecule of the original ingredient (the math behind this: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avogadro_constant" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/en.wikipedia.org');" title="Avogadro's Constant on Wikipedia" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avogadro_constant</a>).</p>
<p>And the chance you&#8217;d get one of my 2 million (ish) swimmy little buddies out of my liquid boy sauce? 1 in 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2008/05/06/free-homeopathic-birth-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Applying Pascal’s Wager to Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2007/11/19/applying-pascal%e2%80%99s-wager-to-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2007/11/19/applying-pascal%e2%80%99s-wager-to-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joisey Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Skepticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cynicgazette.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stright out of the &#8220;Dam, I wish I&#8217;m the one who thought of that&#8221; files, comes a science teacher who takes a look at the global warming argument (not global worming itself) as a simplified cost-benefit argument the same way as noted scientician Pascal made his argument for the benefit of belief in god &#8212; the benefits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stright out of the &#8220;Dam, I wish I&#8217;m the one who thought of that&#8221; files, comes a science teacher who takes a look at the global warming argument (not global worming itself) as a simplified cost-benefit argument the same way as noted scientician Pascal <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_Wager" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/en.wikipedia.org');" target="_self">made his argument</a> for the benefit of belief in god &#8212; the benefits of believing greatly outweigh the benefits of not believing. </p>
<p>Roll that beautiful bean footage:</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/bDsIFspVzfI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bDsIFspVzfI&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
<p>The only issue I have with this, as I post, think about it, and then edit, is that this assumes that if Global Warming is real, it&#8217;s something we can fix. That&#8217;s a little too much dewy-eyed optimism for me, since there&#8217;s favorable data that we can make things better, but not stop them. We can make it our grand kids&#8217; problem though, and since they&#8217;ll be in the future they might have better ideas. Or they can stave it off until their grandkids&#8217; robot <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">overlords</span> protectors fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cynicgazette.com/2007/11/19/applying-pascal%e2%80%99s-wager-to-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
